<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Story Minus Character: Dresden Codak</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saalonmuyo.com/2008/09/14/story-minus-character-dresden-codak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saalonmuyo.com/2008/09/14/story-minus-character-dresden-codak/</link>
	<description>Flashlights and Explosions</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: saalon</title>
		<link>http://www.saalonmuyo.com/2008/09/14/story-minus-character-dresden-codak/comment-page-1/#comment-1356</link>
		<dc:creator>saalon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saalonmuyo.com/?p=205#comment-1356</guid>
		<description>Very good points about comics that work without continuity in its stable of characters, but I disagree that he was talking about not having a permanent cast, if only because Dresden Codak has one, and this quote references his intent in the Hob storyline as well as the overall strip.

While I agree that a comic can work without consistent characterization, I don't think a coherent storyline can.  My critique is leveled primarily at the Hob storyline, which had some a fair amount of intended continuity. 

I brought up the quote to suggest that the author aversion to people returning to the strip primarily for the cast was the reason Hob came off disjointed and disconnected.  That a stronger attention to characterization would have made the Hob story both easier to follow and more satisfying, even if the intention for the strip as a whole was not to be a character driven one.

Thanks for your perspective on this.  It's very appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good points about comics that work without continuity in its stable of characters, but I disagree that he was talking about not having a permanent cast, if only because Dresden Codak has one, and this quote references his intent in the Hob storyline as well as the overall strip.</p>
<p>While I agree that a comic can work without consistent characterization, I don&#8217;t think a coherent storyline can.  My critique is leveled primarily at the Hob storyline, which had some a fair amount of intended continuity. </p>
<p>I brought up the quote to suggest that the author aversion to people returning to the strip primarily for the cast was the reason Hob came off disjointed and disconnected.  That a stronger attention to characterization would have made the Hob story both easier to follow and more satisfying, even if the intention for the strip as a whole was not to be a character driven one.</p>
<p>Thanks for your perspective on this.  It&#8217;s very appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: opuli populi</title>
		<link>http://www.saalonmuyo.com/2008/09/14/story-minus-character-dresden-codak/comment-page-1/#comment-1355</link>
		<dc:creator>opuli populi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saalonmuyo.com/?p=205#comment-1355</guid>
		<description>I think you are misunderstanding the quote.  He's just explaining why he doesn't want a permanent cast of characters.  Strong character writing does not require a recurring cast.  The web comic Partially Clips is a good example.  Also, a recurring cast can get in the way.  Think of Calvin and Hobbes, where in order to wrestle with some big ideas we get all these strips of them sledding off a cliff while they have a discussion.  Those sledding strips barely count as comics because once you have seen a couple the visual aspect and what happens to the characters is totally predictable and could be left out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are misunderstanding the quote.  He&#8217;s just explaining why he doesn&#8217;t want a permanent cast of characters.  Strong character writing does not require a recurring cast.  The web comic Partially Clips is a good example.  Also, a recurring cast can get in the way.  Think of Calvin and Hobbes, where in order to wrestle with some big ideas we get all these strips of them sledding off a cliff while they have a discussion.  Those sledding strips barely count as comics because once you have seen a couple the visual aspect and what happens to the characters is totally predictable and could be left out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.815 seconds -->
